Dear Esteemed Members,
Thank you for your ongoing support of Isaac Sim. Your feedback in 2025 was invaluable, and we’re eager to hear more as we enter 2026.
We’ve opened a new discussion thread on this forum to gather your insights. Please share:
-
Challenges you face when using Isaac Sim
-
Improvements you’d like to see
Your input directly shapes our product development. We appreciate your time and look forward to your thoughts.
How to provide feedback?
Thank you again for helping us enhance Isaac Sim.
Are there any plans to integrate a wider range of path planners directly into Isaac Sim?
Currently, CuRobo is managed separately, and this sometimes leads to compatibility or collision issues depending on the version. It would be highly beneficial if Isaac Sim could natively support a path planner that handles mesh-based obstacles, such as CuRobo, without these version-related concerns.
Additionally, I would love to see support for multiple path planning frameworks, including the Open Motion Planning Library (OMPL), to provide more flexibility for different robotics applications and research scenarios. Expanding the built-in options for path planners would greatly enhance usability and reduce integration complexity.
Is this something that’s on the roadmap?