please looking into TNSPEC for correct board info since there’re different Nano version,
FYI,
by using one device or multiple devices don’t have any differences in terms of flashing operation.
you may confirm with single device to verify mflash.sh
thanks
@JerryChang, @Andrey1984
Is it okay to delete a few scripts under lebre office or /udev/ as long as you ensure normal OS operation when backing up images?
$ sudo cp backup.img bootloader/system.img
and then created massflash blob with $ sudo BOARDID=3448 BOARDSKU=0002 FAB=200 USELEVEL=fuselevel_production ./nvmassflashgen.sh -r 0x21 -y PKC -u <pkc_keyfile> jetson-nano-emmc mmcblk0p1
and then used $ sudo ./nvmflash --showlogs
The Process finished successfully but the device is not booting up for some reason.
In the meantime, I have been making good mass flashing blobs with the USELEVEL option.
But today, I looked at the MassFlash README file again.
It says FUSELEVEL, not USELEVEL.
What’s right? Or is it okay to choose any one?
that might be documentation typo, it’s FUSELEVEL in the command-line.
for example, sudo BOARDID=3448 BOARDSKU=0002 FAB=200 FUSELEVEL=fuselevel_production ./nvmassflashgen.sh -x 0x21 -y PKC -u <pkc_keyfile> jetson-nano-emmc mmcblk0p1
It’s not that the documentation is wrong, I’ve been using this as it is until now when you gave me instructions. The mass flashing blobs were made without any problems and are still in use today. But when I looked at the document, it said FUSELEVEL, so I asked again if there was any problem even with USELEVEL.
Since I used the message JerryChang commented as it is, I have been making blobs with USELEVEL, not FUSELEVEL.
So far, no problems have been reported from customers.