This might be a silly question. I am aware that its only a h/w requirement that you need a 64-bit arch
to address more than 4GB, be it the CPU or the GPU. Will Cuda 32-bit v3.2 SDK restrict me to only 4GB
of available memory ?
I’m developing on a Windows 7 Workstation 64-bit. I am currently uninstalling Visual Studio 2010 since NVCC.exe
doesn’t like it. I am reverting to Visual Studio 2008.
To Summarize my question. Which version of CUDA v3.2 (32-bit or 64-bit?) should I install if I want it to peacefully
coexist with a Win32 VS 2008 Build, and give me full access to 6GB of RAM ?
This might be a silly question. I am aware that its only a h/w requirement that you need a 64-bit arch
to address more than 4GB, be it the CPU or the GPU. Will Cuda 32-bit v3.2 SDK restrict me to only 4GB
of available memory ?
I’m developing on a Windows 7 Workstation 64-bit. I am currently uninstalling Visual Studio 2010 since NVCC.exe
doesn’t like it. I am reverting to Visual Studio 2008.
To Summarize my question. Which version of CUDA v3.2 (32-bit or 64-bit?) should I install if I want it to peacefully
coexist with a Win32 VS 2008 Build, and give me full access to 6GB of RAM ?
This is a bit unrelated, but I’m curious how WMI will report the Quadro 6000. The WMI documentation says it only has 32-bits for the size of video memory and the video memory is reported in number of bytes.
This is a bit unrelated, but I’m curious how WMI will report the Quadro 6000. The WMI documentation says it only has 32-bits for the size of video memory and the video memory is reported in number of bytes.