Have we received a batch of Orin NX 16GB with wrong EEPROM FAB value?

In a recent post I’ve requested help with random MAC in a new batch of Orin NX 16GB with received.

The same batch of modules seem to have a wrong FAB value in EEPROM.

For example, one has the following identification in the 2D matrix label:
1614824601937,3C6D662238BB,699-13767-0000-301,161-0546-10X

If not mistaken, the FAB value is 301.

However, the content of the EEPROM is:

No size specified (using byte-data access)
     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f    0123456789abcdef
00: 02 00 fe 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00 00    ?.?.............
10: 00 01 00 01 36 39 39 2d 31 33 37 36 37 2d 30 30    .?.?699-13767-00
20: 30 30 2d 35 30 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    00-500..........
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
40: b0 48 00 00 bb 38 22 66 6d 3c 31 36 31 34 38 32    ?H..?8"fm<161482
50: 34 36 30 31 39 33 37 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    4601937.........
60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 4e 56 43 42 00 ff 4d 31 00 00    ......NVCB..M1..
a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 bb 38 22 66    ............?8"f
b0: 6d 3c 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    m<?.............
c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e6    ...............?

Here the FAB value seems to be 500. Why is the value different than stated in the label? And although the ID 3767 is correct, isn’t FAB 500 used for AGX according to README_initrd_flash.txt?

Do these modules have the wrong data written into EEPROM?

Let me check with intenral team to get the status with you. Thanks

Hi @kayccc ,

Any news about this?

Hi @kayccc ,

Gentle reminder that we’re still waiting to hear from you. Thanks.

That seems to be a mistake in production line to write those info into EEPROM, and they fixed it since 5/10.
If that’s the concerns, please contact with your distributor, thanks.

I’ll pass this information along to our procurement department. Thank you very much for your help.

This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.