# Inside Pascal: NVIDIA's Newest Computing Platform

**URL:** <https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541>\
**Category:** Technical Blog\
**Created:** [April 5, 2016, 5:23pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541 "2016-04-05T17:23:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon92356358](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon92356358](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon92356358)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 10:21pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/21 "2016-04-06T22:21:48Z")

</div>

Its probably because of the high rate (1/2 FP32) double precision performance. The consumer variant will probably do 1/3rd FP32 DP by running at reduced clocks thereby saving 50 watts or so.  
Also the card quite literally churns 2x compute than Maxwell. The 16nm node halves the transistor size and they put twice the same - law of conservation of die size :P

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon92356358](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon92356358](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon92356358)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 10:33pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/22 "2016-04-06T22:33:30Z")

</div>

They might as well lack all the FP64 as has been the usual case with past architectures except P100's gaming brethren of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon92356358](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon92356358](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon92356358)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/23 "2016-04-06T22:36:07Z")

</div>

I was expecting more information regarding the new pre-emption support and about how this chip might perform asynchronous compute tasks...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon20251040](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon20251040](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon20251040)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 10:51pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/24 "2016-04-06T22:51:43Z")

</div>

Consumer variants of Pascal will more likely resemble Maxwell more than GP100. Although they will have the architecture improvements Pascal brings, just they will lack the dedicated DP shader units.

dedicated DP shader units are bulky and waste die space on a consumer part as they are not used in 3D graphics. The DP shaders are larger than a single SP shader. So they will instead just cut them out of the architecture all together, making the consumer parts far smaller.

And if they make a large consumer part, it will end up with more SP shaders and higher SP performance than GP100 due to not having DP shaders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon92356358](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon92356358](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon92356358)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 11:03pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/25 "2016-04-06T23:03:34Z")

</div>

My opinion is they'll release a titan black like $1000 consumer GPU that will probably have all the HPC centric advancements of P100 except the ECC and nv-link which have no use for consumers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon20251040](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon20251040](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon20251040)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2016, 11:13pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/26 "2016-04-06T23:13:46Z")

</div>

It was mentioned in an article somewhere that when questioned on if we will see GP100 in the consumer space, nvidia said no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon81564343](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon81564343](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon81564343)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 6:57am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/27 "2016-04-07T06:57:27Z")

</div>

there is another site that said this card was like 129k...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon81564343](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon81564343](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon81564343)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 6:57am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/28 "2016-04-07T06:57:48Z")

</div>

im not exactly sure but im guessing about 500k with one...  
if you were to hook 8 of them up together i think you could run everyones solitare at once :D

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon81564343](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon81564343](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon81564343)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 6:58am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/29 "2016-04-07T06:58:34Z")

</div>

i think pascel my be able to but that would be like the $1600 cards

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon81564343](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon81564343](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon81564343)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 7:03am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/30 "2016-04-07T07:03:10Z")

</div>

Yes they do but they hevent Revealed themn yet because they are saving the best for last

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon20251040](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon20251040](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon20251040)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/31 "2016-04-07T07:36:44Z")

</div>

Not the card, an entire server with 8 P100 tesla cards in it. They said price would be 129k at gtc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon92356358](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon92356358](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon92356358)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 10:14am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/32 "2016-04-07T10:14:54Z")

</div>

That's probably because the P100 is not the full chip. By the time they think of releasing titan grade products the node will mature allowing them to incorporate a revised GP100 with all 60 SMs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon20251040](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon20251040](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon20251040)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 10:35am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/33 "2016-04-07T10:35:20Z")

</div>

Also it is a very expensive part and a waste in the consumer space, 1/3 of the die is just Double precision shaders that will never be used on the desktop. They will more than likely use specific parts for consumers that lack dedicated DP shaders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon51531848](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon51531848](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon51531848)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 12:56pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/34 "2016-04-07T12:56:57Z")

</div>

NVlink It is compatible with pci express 3.0? .\_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon79358340](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon79358340](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon79358340)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2016, 6:16pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/35 "2016-04-07T18:16:10Z")

</div>

Next year?????

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon46393664](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon46393664](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon46393664)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 1:12am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/36 "2016-04-08T01:12:44Z")

</div>

Where are the GPU'S for gaming? u.u

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon29032965](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon29032965](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon29032965)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/37 "2016-04-08T18:30:19Z")

</div>

HBM is invention of AMD btw...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon57564592](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon57564592](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon57564592)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2016, 3:13pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/38 "2016-04-10T15:13:17Z")

</div>

Aye, Volta

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon72267818](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon72267818](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon72267818)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2016, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/39 "2016-04-12T07:36:04Z")

</div>

I have a doubt. Considering that each processing block withing a SM only has 8 LD/ST units, wouldn't a load take 4 cycles to be performed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon29175476](https://developer.download.nvidia.com/images/forums/profile-default-devtalk-84.png) [@anon29175476](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/u/anon29175476)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2016, 5:39pm UTC](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541/40 "2016-04-19T17:39:34Z")

</div>

Any plans for low/no FP64 server cards?

[Previous page](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/inside-pascal-nvidias-newest-computing-platform/148541.md?page=3)
