The uname output is about the kernel…the kernel is 64-bit even if user space is 32-bit. If you run “sudo ldconfig -p” you will see what the user space linker sees. Some of that will be “generic” and not indicate its architecture, but other parts should show 32-bit. You could also look at the names of packages via “dpkg -i” and you will see architecture…if it is a user space library it should indicate a 32-bit version. Unless you are working on 32-bit drivers you won’t care about the kernel being 64-bit.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jetson TX2 Architecture: aarch64 can not install jetpack2 | 3 | 1547 | May 29, 2017 | |
| JetPack instalation problem. Error: JetPack must be run on x86_64 HOST platform. Detected platform. | 20 | 6178 | March 30, 2016 | |
| [JetPack 2.2.1][Installing] 64-bit doesn't recognize the processor. | 17 | 2308 | August 29, 2016 | |
| Regarding JetPack installation problem: Error: JetPack must be run on x86_64 HOST platform. Detected | 7 | 6313 | December 20, 2018 | |
| Failing to apt-get update after installing Jetpack 3.1? | 4 | 857 | October 18, 2021 | |
| Jetpack Installation | 2 | 764 | September 19, 2016 | |
| Attempting installation of Anaconda3 on TX2 complains that system architecture is 32bit instead of 64bit. | 6 | 4698 | May 31, 2021 | |
| Did anyone else have issue with apt-get update failing after installing Jetpack 2.2 ? | 5 | 4460 | October 18, 2021 | |
| JetPack 3.2: unmet dependencies for cuda-tools etc. | 11 | 2282 | October 18, 2021 | |
| JetPack 3.2 on TX2 Developer Board | 3 | 784 | October 18, 2021 |