JetPack 4.6.3/L4T 32.7.3 released

JetPack 4.6.3 with L4T 32.7.3 is released. JetPack 4.6.3 is the same as JetPack 4.6.2 but includes Jetson Linux 32.7.3 which brings in security fixes. It also adds support for Jetson TX2 modules with new Hynix memory.

This release supports Jetson AGX Xavier series, Jetson Xavier NX series, Jetson TX2 series, Jetson TX1, and Jetson Nano.

@suhash Will the Jetson Linux downloads be opened for anonymous access? The links on the 32.7.3 page are the JetPack ones that require a login.

@madisox thanks for catching that. It is a mistake. We will correct it.

2 Likes

Just curious, why does the download link look so crazy compared to the previous L4T releases?

https://developer.nvidia.com/downloads/remetpack-463r32releasev73t210jetson-210linur3273aarch64tbz2

versus

https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/l4t/r32_release_v7.2/t210/jetson-210_linux_r32.7.2_aarch64.tbz2

1 Like

Hello @suhash, adding to the above, the new links on the download page no longer follow the usual pattern, i.e https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/l4t/r32_release_v7.3/t210/jetson-210_linux_r32.7.3_aarch64.tbz2 doesn’t work, instead https://developer.nvidia.com/downloads/remetpack-463r32releasev73t210jetson-210linur3273aarch64tbz2 is used.

Is this is expected behavior or is it something that will be fixed?

Thanks

Maybe @WayneWWW can help with fixing the links?

Or maybe @ShaneCCC you could help?

@suhash Are there any dates to when the problem pointed to by madisox will be fixed?

@suhash Do you have an update on the missing links?

I have a new TX2 shipment coming with the latest modules and need to build a new image with meta-tegra. We need the links there to finish the support.

@damien.lefevre can you let me know which missing links? The links on the page look different (for example https://developer.nvidia.com/downloads/remetpack-463r32releasev73t210jetson-210linur3273aarch64tbz2 as opposed to https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/l4t/r32_release_v7.3/t210/jetson-210_linux_r32.7.3_aarch64.tbz2) because we transitioned to a new tool for posting. We will be fixing the tool to have a human redable link like before, but the link works. Would you be able to use those in the meantime?

@suhash It’s not that they need to be human-readable, but have some regularity/consistency of the URLs for scripting purposes (e.g. using in Yocto recipes).

I’ve verified that the URLs on the page do work for anonymous access, so they are usable as they are now. Thanks!

Thanks @suhash! @madisox checked URLs already.