lash algorithm ignores spines?

Using the lash algorithm and with the SM running on a CS7500 with 8 links connected to a SX6518, it looks like the vast majority of all traffic passing through the SX6518 is only making use of ONE of the nine available spine modules. Is there a way to help lash do better; help it to make use of the other 8 spines?

Hello Adam,

Many thanks for posting your question on the Mellanox Community.

Can you please share your fabric topology?

Many thanks,

~Mellanox Technical Support

Hello Adam,

As mentioned, we converted this Community request to a Mellanox Technical Support ticket and we will continue to assist you through the Support ticket.

Many thanks,

~Mellanox Technical Support