First, congratulation for the nice work on the Range Profiler in 5.4. It is going in the right direction for sure! At least for the usage we intend to get with it.
I would like to point you out a very anoying issue regarding the readalibity of the different profile category. It is in fact very useful to get a compare view of, for instance, Range Programs and Perf Markers at the same time, which is very easy to do with your UI.
However, depending of the renderer, we can end-up with a huge vertical stacking of Markers or Programs that completely dismissed the ability to use the UI correctly (with the split windows for comparing results in same UI). We can clone window to get a compare, but it is less responsive and become a bit messy with tiny and packed stuff to read. Also, zooming the timeline won’t work synchronously for both of them.
It would be awesome if resizing the categories don’t resize the Marker’s bar so it will continue to display names and provide ability to set the UI in “compare mode”. Actually, when the category has not been scaled like crazy (at least on our end), the different icons will start to be too tiny and won’t display text anymore. In addition to that, when we are in a big capture (lots of draws), the UI response is quite affected so scaling or zooming is starving the workflow. If we can set a nice UI layout, it will be done once and then afterwards get a better access to the tool.
Here is an screenshot that shows the issue on our end.
Keep up the good work! We can feel in this version that it begins to be solid with a clearer view of the tool mindset.