Honestly, after playing around with the code and reading the docs again, I’m not quite sure what I got hung up on earlier. This is clearly a functional bug. The docs and even the API name contain “dynamic shared memory” and there is no reason to believe reserved shared memory is part of that. Have you filed it as a bug already?
paleonix
12
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How to use cudaOccupancyMaxPotentialBlockSizeVariableSMem | 7 | 694 | October 17, 2023 | |
| Dynamic shared memory calculated by ncu larger than Max_shared_memory_per_block | 3 | 869 | September 7, 2023 | |
| Default value of max dynamic shared memory | 8 | 466 | December 23, 2024 | |
| shared memory and CUDA calculator | 6 | 4181 | October 26, 2008 | |
| NCU dynamic shared memory display question | 1 | 568 | April 3, 2024 | |
| Question about max shared memory in block and multiprocessor | 1 | 2397 | February 20, 2024 | |
| [ON HOLD] Issue with cuda_occupancy and cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig(...) | 7 | 2447 | June 26, 2018 | |
| Amount of Shared Memory | 10 | 4443 | June 3, 2010 | |
| Find the limit of shared memory that can be used per block | 2 | 14309 | March 17, 2017 | |
| question about dynamic shared memory | 3 | 2893 | June 7, 2010 |