We trained a new dataset and model by follow “two days to a demo.”
And deployed images on DIGITS and TX2 with JP3.1.(JP3.)
But we got the different prediction results on DIGITS and TX2.
For example: 1.class A on DIGITS got correct predictions and high accuracy around 98%.
2.class A on TX2 got class B prediction and low a accuracy around 45%.

TX2: TX2 EVB board with JP3.1 (OS & AP)

The thing is we got a same prediction result as tested a GoogleNet-ILSVRC12-subset.
We trained and deployed GoogleNet-ILSVRC12-subset model on DIGITS and TX2.
And got the same prediction results. (see attached.)

Hi,
Thank you for your prompt support.
I got different classify result as I turned off cuda mean subtract.
However, the result was still not correct.
Plus, I did not see any different as I disable FP16 or added mean_binary.
Is there any information about how to adjust the cuda mean value?
How to match DIGITS used?

I did follow GoogleNet-ILSVRC12-subset command you posted to test the model we built on TX2.
And got the result I posted. (will send the screenshot later)
I also tested bird-0.jpg on DIGITS & TX2/TR and got the same accuracy on both.

I’m confused by the different accuracys on DIGITS and TR.
Also found different models I built on DIGITS and TR could have different accuracy by following GoogleNet-ILSVRC12-subset command.

Thank you for your support.
We are still working on our new dataset.
As I adjusted the mean_value and got different inferenced result on Tx2.
But it’s hard to know what mean_value should I use.
Due to DIGITS mean.binaryproto is not readable.
Is there a way to know how to choose the mean_value to match DIGITS’s presiction result?
I will send you one of our model later.

Thank you for your support.
Yes. Subtract Mean Pixel was selected as we build the model.
Also, I have tried several code mean pixel value already and got the different inference result.
But I have not found the correct one yet.

The other thing is the mean pixel value can be different as the dataset is changed.
Actually, we sre still working on our dataset and struggle on what mean pixel value should we use on TX2.

That’s why I asked “Is there a way to know how to choose the mean_value to match DIGITS’s presiction result?”

Hi,
As discussed above, my prediction results are returning lower confidence values. If I try inferencing the same .caffemodel with caffe python scripts, it’s returning confidence of over 90%. I have trained the AlexNet model in DIGITS with the mean value set to - Pixel.

I have replaced the cudaPreImageNetMean with cudaPreImageNet, so that duplicate mean subtraction doesn’t happen.
My doubts are :

Should the cudaNormalizeRGBA API needs to be used ?

In Jetson-inference repo, is the mean file which we load at the time of inference model creation, is really being used of is it just using the hard coded values --> make_float3(104.0069879317889f, 116.66876761696767f, 122.6789143406786f) ? If no, can we find the values by ourselves ?

Does the image (RGB/BRR) has some influence on the confidence values ?