I have absolutely no idea if PCI would work. None whatsoever. With that said, it is a really bad idea–PCI-e transfer times are bad enough, and once you get to PCI transfer speeds, it would be laughable. Upgrading to PCIe is definitely the way to go, especially since the Northwood is so slow compared to current processors.
I actually kind of want to buy one now just to see the bandwidthTest results… (“100 megs a second! dude!”)
PNY offer one 8500GT card for PCI bus, passively cooled, 256MB 128bit RAM I believe.
I tried this with Folding@Home, gave me 650 points per day, where an nVidia 8800GT gives 4800 points per day. It also ran hot at 102 degrees celsius because air flow was bad.
This board occupies double slot width because of the large aluminum cooler.
So for performance computing this is not ideal, but for development purposes or embedded apps (IPCs) it could be a solution
It’s not a PCI card, but the NVS290 1x works fine with CUDA. If you’re in no hurry, that is:
Running on......
device 0:Quadro NVS 290
Range Mode
Host to Device Bandwidth for Pinned memory
Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s)
33554432 165.1
Range Mode
Device to Host Bandwidth for Pinned memory
Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s)
33554432 204.9
Range Mode
Device to Device Bandwidth
Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s)
33554432 4003.7
Pageable is about the same, the overhead becomes negligible.
It does run X11 just fine w/o using a x16 slot, and that’s all we ask of it. Nice card.
Albatron just released an 8600GT that’s PCI. Haven’t been able to find a place to buy it yet. PCI is a actually a really good formfactor for a general-purpose accelerator. Not every app stresses bus bandwidth.
P.S. Yes, it should work, though I haven’t tried it. Nice thing about PCIe is that it’s backwards compatible at the driver/os level, so NVIDIA’s drivers ought to work. No promises, tho. (worst case, you’d have to wait for Albatron to re-release the drivers after every update)