With these new nvv4l2 element I made a test. While omxh265dec and nvv4l2decoder performs same, nvv4l2h264enc is %50 slow compared to omxh264enc. What is the reason for that?
Is it because it is new and not yet stable?
Cpu Usage omxh264enc | nvv4l2h264enc
300mhz cpu core| %50 | %50
2ghz cpu core | %60 | %80
Encoding time | 12 seconds | 21 seconds
Other cores are sleeping.
And omxh264enc takes 12 seconds while nvv4l2h264enc takes 21 second.
Is there anyone who takes similar results?
For reference I did decode a 4k video with the same element and encode it back.