I think one of the things that would be great to know is what’s the upstream / unofficial / “DIY” status of Jetson Nano (somewhat hard to follow). i.e. if someone goes the way of using Jetpack 5 GPU driver (which seems to have support for Nano in itself) along with mainline kernel.
1 Like
@prlawrence It would be good if there is no jetpack 5 for jetson nano
Know what changes have to be made to the upstream kernel to support jetson nano correctly since the kernel structure has several folders outside the standard kernel folder.
On the other hand, I agree with theofficialgman with what I keep saying, launching a rootfs based on 20.04/22.04. I don’t think it make it very difficult if I have wasted a little time and a functional image is created, but of course basing a rootf from an old version will only give you very bad image for the gallery.
Also tell me what reason there is to leave jetson nano/TX1/TX2 without Vulkan 1.3 support when it can technically support it.
Nintendo switch under Horizon OS does have such support so there are many things that jetson TX1/TX2 can technically support and it doesn’t.
And it is important to run Vulkan 1.3 if you want to run things and engines with a modern approach i.e DXVK 2.0 and DX11/DX12_1 level under linux .
1 Like