**• Jetson Nano **
**• DeepStream 5.0 (GA) **
**• JetPack 4.4 **
**• TensorRT 220.127.116.11 **
**• question/bug ? **
It is possible to find out more precisely the operation of the Line Crossing feature in Gst-
I tried to do the deployment in real conditions, during 2 days of operation (movements of about 300 people in the interior) and …
Because, despite stable tracking and a relatively short interval of pgie (3) on jetson nano, with one input stream, it was very often the case that the line cross was simply not counted. Nevertheless, the visual OSD plotted the tracking number as well as the frame of the detected person, while crossing the line.
When I evaluated the all-day statistics, the deviation was almost 40% - compared to the actual state - which is quite bad, apart from the fact that the detector itself behaved quite stable.
I would be interested in e.g. thus, as the quality of the evaluation can be influenced by the setting of the “direction” of the vector (eg its length, orientation deviation, operation of the “mode” parameter), fps (because in this setup it was 15/3 = 5 detection per second, so the tracker deviation was negligible) , another tracker configuration which is better (I used klt. - with satisfactory performance)?
SW configs (partial)
just one rtsp stream (fullhd, 15fps)