Weird answer from nsight copilot

I think this answer is very ridiculous.

Can you share your prompt with us too.

Hi,

I asked here is that “ what’s the cc of NVIDIA’S RTX PRO 6000?“
And before that, I asked the same question in Chinese. I thought the answer actually pointed to QUADRO RTX 6000 and maybe it was due to the language, so I asked again in English.
Long ahead of this, I was asking how to compile the kernel on rtx pro 6000, which now I have figured out. Interestingly, I couldn’t make it because I was using like “code=sm_90” which ought to be something like“code=sm_120“. But I didn’t find any clue that suggested me to use sm_120, or the compute capability is 12.0. Actually I found the “sm_120“ from the gitlab “GitHub - Audible83/vllm-blackwell-setup: “Complete setup guide for multi-GPU vLLM inference on NVIDIA Blackwell RTX Pro 6000 cards with Ubuntu 24.04, CUDA 12.8, and NCCL optimization”
Anyway, it’s probably due to that i’m not familiar with the compilation.

Also here’s some answers from others. The chat has been refreshed.
Sorry for that we used Chinese, but the underlined words here means that the use of arch=compute_90,code=sm_90 can directly generate the SASS to support RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

I think it’s not correct?

Thanks for your valuable feedback, Give us some time to review and we will get back.