Orin nano frequency locking failed

Robotics & Edge Computing Jetson Systems Jetson Orin Nano
1

Custom hardware device: orin nano 4G
software version:JetPack 5.1.5

When I was doing stress testing on Orin Nano, I found that I couldn’t lock the frequency. After executing sudo jetson_clocks, the frequency still decreased.

Here is test command:

sudo nvpmodel -m 0
sudo jetson_clocks
stress-ng --cpu $(nproc) --cpu-method matrixprod --cpu-load  95 &
stress-ng --vm 6 --vm-bytes 500M --vm-method all &
./matrixMulCUBLAS --sizemult=8 &

After execution, use jtop to check that both CPU and GPU are running at full capacity.

Then use tegrastats check freq:

01-01-1970 00:13:02 RAM 1544/3425MB (lfb 279x4MB) SWAP 1/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 27%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.375C SOC2@42.187C SOC0@40.468C CV1@-256C GPU@39.812C tj@42.375C SOC1@41.562C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8591mW/8591mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2932mW/2932mW VDD_SOC 1804mW/1804mW
01-01-1970 00:13:03 RAM 1558/3425MB (lfb 276x4MB) SWAP 1/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 27%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.25C SOC2@42.218C SOC0@40.562C CV1@-256C GPU@39.937C tj@42.218C SOC1@41.531C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8552mW/8571mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2932mW/2932mW VDD_SOC 1804mW/1804mW
01-01-1970 00:13:04 RAM 1597/3425MB (lfb 268x4MB) SWAP 1/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 27%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.5C SOC2@42.187C SOC0@40.687C CV1@-256C GPU@39.75C tj@42.5C SOC1@41.562C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8552mW/8565mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2937mW/2933mW VDD_SOC 1804mW/1804mW
01-01-1970 00:13:05 RAM 2138/3425MB (lfb 148x4MB) SWAP 1/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 30%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 22%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.343C SOC2@42.312C SOC0@40.656C CV1@-256C GPU@39.75C tj@42.343C SOC1@41.75C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8670mW/8591mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2971mW/2943mW VDD_SOC 1883mW/1823mW
01-01-1970 00:13:06 RAM 2432/3425MB (lfb 53x4MB) SWAP 1/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 30%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 7%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.25C SOC2@42.25C SOC0@40.625C CV1@-256C GPU@39.968C tj@42.25C SOC1@41.562C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8631mW/8599mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2937mW/2941mW VDD_SOC 1843mW/1827mW
01-01-1970 00:13:08 RAM 2696/3425MB (lfb 3x4MB) SWAP 2/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 31%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.406C SOC2@42.312C SOC0@40.656C CV1@-256C GPU@40.156C tj@42.406C SOC1@41.843C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8670mW/8611mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2893mW/2933mW VDD_SOC 1883mW/1836mW
01-01-1970 00:13:09 RAM 2817/3425MB (lfb 1x2MB) SWAP 121/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [99%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 31%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 99%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42.437C SOC2@42.531C SOC0@40.875C CV1@-256C GPU@40.156C tj@42.5C SOC1@41.75C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 9556mW/8746mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 3630mW/3033mW VDD_SOC 1958mW/1854mW
01-01-1970 00:13:10 RAM 2819/3425MB (lfb 1x2MB) SWAP 121/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@751,100%@750,100%@747,100%@748,100%@762,100%@750] EMC_FREQ 51%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 99%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@41.906C SOC2@42.687C SOC0@41.281C CV1@-256C GPU@40.718C tj@42.687C SOC1@41.812C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 10597mW/8977mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 3936mW/3146mW VDD_SOC 2307mW/1910mW
01-01-1970 00:13:11 RAM 2820/3425MB (lfb 1x2MB) SWAP 121/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@749,100%@749,100%@763,100%@751,100%@757,100%@748] EMC_FREQ 59%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 99%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@41.843C SOC2@42.781C SOC0@41.5C CV1@-256C GPU@40.562C tj@42.781C SOC1@41.875C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 10636mW/9161mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 3936mW/3233mW VDD_SOC 2307mW/1954mW
01-01-1970 00:13:12 RAM 2820/3425MB (lfb 1x2MB) SWAP 121/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@749,100%@748,100%@750,100%@749,100%@748,100%@749] EMC_FREQ 63%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 99%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@41.843C SOC2@42.937C SOC0@41.593C CV1@-256C GPU@40.968C tj@42.937C SOC1@41.937C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 10636mW/9309mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 3936mW/3304mW VDD_SOC 2303mW/1989mW
01-01-1970 00:13:13 RAM 2820/3425MB (lfb 1x2MB) SWAP 121/1713MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@720,100%@748,100%@748,100%@749,100%@748,100%@751] EMC_FREQ 64%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 99%@[0,624] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@42C SOC2@42.968C SOC0@41.75C CV1@-256C GPU@40.75C tj@43C SOC1@42.031C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 10636mW/9429mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 3936mW/3361mW VDD_SOC 2303mW/2018mW

top command:

nvidia@tegra-ubuntu:~$ top
top - 00:16:40 up 8 min,  1 user,  load average: 12.58, 7.36, 3.09
Tasks: 277 total,  14 running, 263 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu0  : 97.7 us,  1.3 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  1.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu1  : 99.3 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.7 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu2  : 99.0 us,  0.7 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.3 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu3  : 78.4 us, 21.0 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.7 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu4  : 99.0 us,  0.3 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.3 hi,  0.3 si,  0.0 st
%Cpu5  : 99.0 us,  0.3 sy,  0.0 ni,  0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.3 hi,  0.3 si,  0.0 st
MiB Mem :   3425.2 total,     98.1 free,   2851.3 used,    475.8 buff/cache
MiB Swap:   1712.6 total,   1592.9 free,    119.8 used.    381.9 avail Mem

    PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
   3604 nvidia    20   0  115860  97116    976 R  47.5   2.8   1:57.47 stress-ng-vm
   3554 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  46.9   0.1   1:55.68 stress-ng-cpu
   3558 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  46.6   0.1   1:56.58 stress-ng-cpu
   3601 nvidia    20   0  115860  97200    976 R  46.6   2.8   1:56.20 stress-ng-vm
   3676 root      20   0 5599040   1.3g 500192 R  46.6  37.9   1:51.53 matrixMulCUBLAS
   3557 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  46.2   0.1   1:58.30 stress-ng-cpu
   3555 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  45.2   0.1   1:59.04 stress-ng-cpu
   3605 nvidia    20   0  115860  97116    976 R  45.2   2.8   1:58.82 stress-ng-vm
   3606 nvidia    20   0  115860  97256    976 R  45.2   2.8   1:57.16 stress-ng-vm
   3602 nvidia    20   0  115860  97192    976 R  44.6   2.8   1:58.11 stress-ng-vm
   3556 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  44.3   0.1   1:55.74 stress-ng-cpu
   3553 nvidia    20   0   19836   3520   1104 R  43.3   0.1   1:55.37 stress-ng-cpu
   3603 nvidia    20   0  115860  97116    976 R  43.3   2.8   1:58.65 stress-ng-vm
    242 root      19  -1   46080  11772   8448 S   0.7   0.3   0:00.89 systemd-journal
   3764 root      20   0    2656   1588   1464 S   0.7   0.0   0:00.97 tegrastats
    705 systemd+  20   0   25072  12764   8168 S   0.3   0.4   0:00.61 systemd-resolve
   3286 nvidia    20   0   15420   5776   4496 S   0.3   0.2   0:00.62 sshd
   3300 nvidia    20   0    9076   2384   2232 S   0.3   0.1   0:00.73 bash
   4871 nvidia    20   0   11688   3276   2532 R   0.3   0.1   0:00.07 top
      1 root      20   0  170404  10884   7136 S   0.0   0.3   0:09.33 systemd
      2 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.02 kthreadd
      3 root       0 -20       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 rcu_gp
      4 root       0 -20       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 rcu_par_gp
      6 root       0 -20       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 kworker/0:0H-kblockd
      7 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.26 kworker/u12:0-events_power_efficient
      8 root       0 -20       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 mm_percpu_wq
      9 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 rcu_tasks_kthre
     10 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 rcu_tasks_rude_
     11 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 rcu_tasks_trace
     12 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.02 ksoftirqd/0
     13 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.10 rcu_preempt
     14 root      rt   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 migration/0
     16 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 cpuhp/0
     17 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 cpuhp/1
     18 root      rt   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 migration/1
     19 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.02 ksoftirqd/1
     21 root       0 -20       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 kworker/1:0H-events_highpri
     22 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 cpuhp/2
     23 root      rt   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 migration/2
     24 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:00.01 ksoftirqd/2
     25 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0.0   0.0   0:00.00 kworker/2:0-mm_percpu_wq

When testing Orin NX 8g/16g, the same issue was encountered.

I want to know how Orin enforces frequency locking.

4

Hi jack.yan,

Are you using the devkit or custom board for Orin Nano?

Do you kill the previous processes for stress-ng before you start the new test?

Could you also verify with the latest Jetpack 6.1.2(r36.4.4) to check if there’s the similar issue?

I’m using Orin Nano devkit with Jetpack 6.2.1 and I don’t get such CPU frequency decreasing issue as yours.

5

I`m using our custom board.

Before testing, it was confirmed that there was no test program running.

Our system requires the use of JekPack 5.1.5, so I only installed Ubuntu 20.04.

6

Could you also verify it on the devkit to check if there’s the similar issue?

But I saw multiple processes of those stress-ng in the result you shared..

Okay, I will do another test with Jetpack 5.1.5 to verify and let you know the result.

7

The devkit I purchased is damaged and cannot be tested normally.

This is because stress-ng creates a test process for each CPU core, and the number of processes in stress ng is equal to the number of CPU cores, which is expected.

You can execute the following test command to verify on Jetpack 5.1.5:

sudo nvpmodel -m 0
sudo jetson_clocks
stress-ng --cpu $(nproc) --cpu-method matrixprod --cpu-load  95 &
stress-ng --vm 6 --vm-bytes 500M --vm-method all &
./matrixMulCUBLAS --sizemult=8 &
8

I’ve referred to the commands you shared and verified on the Orin Nano devkit with Jetpack 5.1.5.

nvidia@Jetson:~$ cat /etc/nv_tegra_release 
# R35 (release), REVISION: 6.1, GCID: 39721438, BOARD: t186ref, EABI: aarch64, DATE: Tue Mar  4 10:13:09 UTC 2025
nvidia@Jetson:~$ sudo jetson_clocks
nvidia@Jetson:~$ stress-ng --cpu $(nproc) --cpu-method matrixprod --cpu-load  95 &
[1] 3348
nvidia@Jetson:~$ stress-ng: info:  [3348] defaulting to a 86400 second (1 day, 0.00 secs) run per stressor
stress-ng: info:  [3348] dispatching hogs: 6 cpu
nvidia@Jetson:~$ stress-ng --vm 6 --vm-bytes 500M --vm-method all &
[2] 3356
nvidia@Jetson:~$ stress-ng: info:  [3356] defaulting to a 86400 second (1 day, 0.00 secs) run per stressor
stress-ng: info:  [3356] dispatching hogs: 6 vm
nvidia@Jetson:~$ ./matrixMulCUBLAS --sizemult=8

There’s no similar CPU frequency issue as yours.

12-01-2025 03:24:19 RAM 2575/7451MB (lfb 961x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 15%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.562C SOC2@44.562C SOC0@42.875C CV1@-256C GPU@45.375C tj@46.562C SOC1@43.75C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7139mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2950mW/2327mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1574mW
12-01-2025 03:24:20 RAM 2575/7451MB (lfb 961x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 15%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.968C SOC2@44.625C SOC0@42.781C CV1@-256C GPU@45.656C tj@46.625C SOC1@43.75C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8480mW/7149mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2950mW/2331mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1576mW
12-01-2025 03:24:21 RAM 2575/7451MB (lfb 961x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 15%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.625C SOC2@44.625C SOC0@42.875C CV1@-256C GPU@45.625C tj@46.625C SOC1@43.843C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8480mW/7158mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2950mW/2335mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1578mW
12-01-2025 03:24:22 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 15%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.937C SOC2@44.687C SOC0@42.781C CV1@-256C GPU@45.343C tj@46.937C SOC1@43.781C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7167mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2870mW/2339mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1579mW
12-01-2025 03:24:23 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.781C SOC2@44.625C SOC0@42.812C CV1@-256C GPU@45.406C tj@46.781C SOC1@43.875C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7175mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2791mW/2342mW VDD_SOC 1840mW/1581mW
12-01-2025 03:24:24 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 18%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.75C SOC2@44.625C SOC0@42.843C CV1@-256C GPU@45.562C tj@46.75C SOC1@44.031C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8480mW/7184mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2631mW/2344mW VDD_SOC 1880mW/1583mW
12-01-2025 03:24:25 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 20%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.75C SOC2@44.625C SOC0@42.75C CV1@-256C GPU@45.437C tj@46.75C SOC1@44C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8480mW/7193mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2671mW/2346mW VDD_SOC 1880mW/1585mW
12-01-2025 03:24:26 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 17%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.75C SOC2@44.718C SOC0@43.093C CV1@-256C GPU@45.375C tj@46.75C SOC1@43.937C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7201mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2350mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1586mW
12-01-2025 03:24:27 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.687C SOC2@44.687C SOC0@43.031C CV1@-256C GPU@45.593C tj@46.687C SOC1@43.968C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8400mW/7209mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2353mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1588mW
12-01-2025 03:24:28 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.656C SOC2@44.718C SOC0@42.937C CV1@-256C GPU@45.437C tj@46.656C SOC1@43.968C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7218mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2356mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1589mW
12-01-2025 03:24:29 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1659] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@47C SOC2@44.718C SOC0@42.937C CV1@-256C GPU@45.375C tj@47C SOC1@43.968C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8400mW/7225mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2359mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1591mW
12-01-2025 03:24:30 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.75C SOC2@44.75C SOC0@42.937C CV1@-256C GPU@45.5C tj@46.75C SOC1@44C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7233mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2362mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1592mW
12-01-2025 03:24:31 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.968C SOC2@44.812C SOC0@42.968C CV1@-256C GPU@45.656C tj@46.968C SOC1@44.187C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8400mW/7241mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2870mW/2365mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1593mW
12-01-2025 03:24:32 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.875C SOC2@44.843C SOC0@42.968C CV1@-256C GPU@45.875C tj@46.875C SOC1@44.343C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8400mW/7248mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2368mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1595mW
12-01-2025 03:24:33 RAM 1997/7451MB (lfb 1002x4MB) SWAP 1/3726MB (cached 0MB) CPU [100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510,100%@1510] EMC_FREQ 16%@2133 GR3D_FREQ 0%@[624,0] VIC_FREQ 435 APE 200 CV0@-256C CPU@46.843C SOC2@44.843C SOC0@43.156C CV1@-256C GPU@45.531C tj@46.843C SOC1@44.25C CV2@-256C VDD_IN 8440mW/7256mW VDD_CPU_GPU_CV 2830mW/2371mW VDD_SOC 1800mW/1596mW

Please refer to above result and use the devkit to verify and clarify if the issue is specific to your custom carrier board.