Hello,
I’m looking at the datasheet for Xavier SoM (DS-09654-002_v1.5) and have some questions regarding the random/sine vibration tests. It seems like the JAX and JAXi are very similarly tested, if not exactly the same.
JAX
Test | Test Conditions | Reference Standards |
---|---|---|
Sine Vibration – 5G 2 sweeps | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 3 axes, 2 sweeps/axis, non-operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Random Vibration – 5G | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 8 hours/axis, non-operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
JAXi
Test | Test Conditions | Reference Standards |
---|---|---|
Sine Vibration | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 3 axes, 2 sweeps/axis, FCT, Visual, operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Random Vibration | 10-1000 Hz, 3 Grms, 3-axis, FCT, non-operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
Random Vibration | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 3-axis, FCT, operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
This is however not true when comparing the TX2 vs TX2i modules (taken from JETSON | TX2 SERIES | DATASHEET | 1.8):
TX2
Test | Test Conditions | Reference Standards |
---|---|---|
Sine Vibration – .75G | 0.75G, 10-500 Hz, 1 sweep/axis, 3 axes total, non-operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Sine Vibration – .25G | 0.25G, 10-500 Hz, 1 sweep/axis, 3 axes total, operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Random Vibration – 2G | 10-500 Hz, 2 Grms,1 hour/axis, non-operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
Random Vibration – 1G | 10-500 Hz, 1 Grms,15 min/axis, operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
TX2i
Test | Test Conditions | Reference Standards |
---|---|---|
Sine Vibration – 5G 10 sweeps | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 3 axes, 10 sweeps/axis, non-operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Sine Vibration – 5G 2 sweeps | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 3 axes, 2 sweeps/axis, operational | IEC60068-2-6 |
Random Vibration – 5G | 10-500 Hz, 5 Grms, 8 hours/axis, non-operational | IEC60068-2-64 |
Random Vibration – 10G | 10-500 Hz, 10 Grms, 1 hour Z-axis, operational | NVIDIA Standard |
Is the JAXi not supposed to be more rugged concerning vibration levels compared to JAX? Will the JAXi be tested using “Nvidia Standard” as the TX2i was?
Thanks in advance