I am debugging SPI communication on a Jetson Nano running JetPack 4 with Ubuntu 18.04. To begin troubleshooting, I dumped the running device tree using dtc -I fs -O dts -o running.dts /proc/device-tree and reviewed the output to confirm that SPI nodes were correctly configured. The SPI interfaces appeared as expected. Next, I verified the SPI pinmux configuration with sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tegra_pinctrl_reg | grep -i spi to ensure that the correct pins were assigned for SPI rather than GPIO. I also manually enabled SPI using the Jetson-IO tool and confirmed that SPI1 was properly assigned to the intended pins. After setting up SPI, I loaded the spidev module with sudo modprobe spidev and checked for available SPI devices by running ls /dev/spidev*. The output listed /dev/spidev0.0, /dev/spidev0.1, /dev/spidev1.0, and /dev/spidev1.1, confirming that the devices were recognized. I proceeded with an SPI loopback test running sudo ./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev0.0 -v and sudo ./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev1.0 -v showed that TX data was being sent, but the RX buffer consistently returned all zeros. I attempted to adjust SPI speed and switch between /dev/spidev1.0 and /dev/spidev1.1, but the issue remained unresolved. To rule out kernel-related issues, I checked dmesg | grep -i spi for any errors. The logs showed no critical errors. Suspecting that the SPI pins might still be assigned as GPIO by default, I ran sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tegra_pinctrl_reg | grep -i spi again to confirm that the correct pins were mapped for SPI functionality. Everything seemed in order.
To ensure that the issue was not caused by faulty wiring, i verified the continuity using a multimeter. The multimeter confirmed that the connection was sound, ruling out electrical wiring issues. Despite this, the loopback test continued to return TX data without any RX response.
Given this, I suspect one of the following possibilities: (1) the Jetson Nano might require explicit Chip Select (CS) control for proper loopback, meaning the CS line must be actively driven LOW during transmission; (2) the SPI controller might not support loopback mode without an actual slave device, which raises the question of whether there is an alternative way to validate loopback functionality
though, i am not totally sure if i am in the right direction as I am very new to the environment. i have tried direct nrf24 and jetson nano communication and it also did not communicate properly. what could i be doing wrong?