Yes I understand the pixel packing, but what I don’t understand is that there is also a pixel packing with Jetson Nano, but the v4l2 output is as expected (without any pixelpacking or automatic unpacking) … So when my test pixel value is 48, I receive 48 as the v4l2-output without me doing anything special whereas with Xavier NX I am getting the output with the pixel packing , I tried both T_R16 and T_R16_I
Output from nano (which is same as expected):
[ 48 8 48 … 784 384 784]
Output from Xavier :
[ 3075 512 3075 … 50225 24600 50225]
Do you think that the pixel unpacking has to be handled explicitly ???