The video shows the effect of Nurec scene reconstruction.The image is a verification of the point cloud to image 3D mapping process. The point cloud to image mapping effect is acceptable during the verification process, but why do vehicles in the video have motion blur and wheels disappear?
Could you please help me resolve this confusion? From what aspects should I verify and solve this problem?
My thinking is as follows: Because the vehicle travels at a low speed, the issue of image point cloud asynchrony may not need to be considered.
How is frame_timestamps_us populated for each camera in their NCore converter — one global timestamp repeated across cameras, or per-camera per-frame [exposure_start, exposure_end] with rolling-shutter correction?
What shutter type / shutter_delay_us do they record for each camera?
Are dynamic-vehicle cuboid tracks present in the NCore sequence? What accuracy / source (human GT vs. detector)?
Is BBox3.centroid geometric center or bottom-center in their source data?
Pose graph density — are intermediate ego/actor poses denser than one per image frame (i.e., < LiDAR sweep duration)?
What training config + tracks_calib option did they use?
We are currently using the [exposure_start, exposure_end] mode, with shutter_delay_us set to 68ms.
The current data only contains point cloud and image information, and does not include cuboids. Will adding cuboids improve the scene reproduction effect?
The length of the vehicle trajectory data is the same as that of the lidar data.Below I will show some formats of pose, image, and lidar data:
Based on the suggestion, we removed lidar model supervision during scene reconstruction, which resulted in even worse scene reconstruction performance.(The left side shows the result of pure image scene reconstruction, and the right side shows the result of reconstruction including radar model.)