Camera functional safety - SIPL

I have found this link that provides information on SIPL notifications SIPL Camera notifications. A couple of questions.

  1. Assume the notification list above is the definitive list of faults that SIPL can included in a transmission(For example 209 would report a camera failure)? Are there any other lists I should reference?
  2. Is there a safety manual for SIPL?
  3. Is there an implied maximum ASIL rating for SIPL? (Question is only focused on the SIPL framework itself).
  4. Does the SIPL layer include information directly from the imager? For example if 209 is true, is that made true due to some internal camera fault notification?

Please provide the following info (check/uncheck the boxes after creating this topic):
Software Version
DRIVE OS Linux 5.2.6
DRIVE OS Linux 5.2.6 and DriveWorks 4.0
DRIVE OS Linux 5.2.0
DRIVE OS Linux 5.2.0 and DriveWorks 3.5
NVIDIA DRIVE™ Software 10.0 (Linux)
NVIDIA DRIVE™ Software 9.0 (Linux)
other DRIVE OS version
other

Target Operating System
Linux
QNX
other

Hardware Platform
NVIDIA DRIVE™ AGX Xavier DevKit (E3550)
NVIDIA DRIVE™ AGX Pegasus DevKit (E3550)
other

SDK Manager Version
1.9.1.10844
other

Host Machine Version
native Ubuntu 18.04
other

Dear @chaase1 ,
Yes. SIPL Camera notifications list the events of the image processing pipeline and the device block when using SIPL framework .
May I know if used platform is DRIVE AGX Xavier or Orin?
For safety related information/issues, please contact your NVIDIA representative.

Could you please respond to my original questions?

  1. Assume the notification list above is the definitive list of faults that SIPL can included in a transmission(For example 209 would report a camera failure)? Are there any other lists I should reference?
  2. Is there a safety manual for SIPL?
  3. Is there an implied maximum ASIL rating for SIPL(and associated driver)? (Question is only focused on the SIPL framework itself).
  4. Does the SIPL layer include information directly from the imager? For example if 209 is true, is that made true due to some internal camera fault notification?